Expanding &
Complicating the Rhetorical Tradition (53)
Some provisional guiding questions (from fairly broad to more specific) for
my research are:
§ How does a feminist orientation influence how rhetorical practices are
theorized, particularly rhetorical practices surrounding discourses of
technology and labor? Conversely, how might theories of the rhetoric of various
technologies (interfaces, platforms, and programming) complicate feminist
models of rhetoric?
§ How is literacy portrayed in the teaching of digital rhetorics and
programming? What assumptions undergird this portrayal and pedagogical
approach? What are the implications of this pedagogical approach for
composition, especially given Vee’s argument about the ways in which
programming recodes writing?
§ How
might a transnational feminist examination of the rhetoric of women’s coding
literacy movements (1) productively complicate current discussions of coding
literacy within rhetoric and (2) yield insight into the animating ideologies
and discursive practices of these movements?
Rationale
Within the discipline of rhetoric, my primary focus will center on the
tranformation of the rhetorical tradition through the creation of new models
for understanding language and the non-discursive, analyses of specific sites
of rhetorical practice, and feminist theoretical interventions into histories
of rhetoric. In Feminist Rhetorical
Practices, Jacqueline Jones Royster
and Gesa Kirsch call upon rhetoricians to “operationalize the view of rhetoric
as a vibrant and interestingly diverse global interprise” (151). In crafting
this list, I hope to understand the rhetorical tradition with particular
emphasis on the practices of historically marginalized individuals and
communities. Such work naturally extends from an intersectional feminist
orientation.
Sites of Rhetorical Practice (26)
Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La
Frontera: The New Mestiza. Aunt Lute, 1987. [monograph]
Baca, Damián. “te-ixtli: The “Other Face” of
the Americas.” Rhetorics of the Americas, 3114 BCE to 2012 CE, edited by Damián Baca and Victor
Villaneuva. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp.1-14. [chapter]
Bitzer, Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 1, no.
1, 1968, pp. 1–14. [article]
Borrowman, Shane, Robert L. Lively, and Marcia Kemtz. “Introduction: Still a Great
Story.” Rhetoric in the Rest of the West, edited by Shane Borrowman, Robert L. Lively, and Marcia Kemtz.
Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars, 2010. [chapter]
Canagarajah, Suresh. Translingual
Practices and Neoliberal Policies. Berlin: Springer. 2016. [monograph]
Dingo, Rebecca. “Speaking Well: The Benevolent
Public and Rhetorical Production of Neoliberal Political Economy.” Communication
and the Public, vol. 3, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 232–46. [article]
Edbauer, Jenny. “Unframing Models of Public
Distribution: From Rhetorical Situation to Rhetorical Ecologies.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly vol. 35, no.
4, 2005, pp. 5–24. [article]
Enoch, Jessica. Refiguring Rhetorical Education: Women Teaching
African American, Native American, and Chicano/a Students, 1865-1911. Southern
Illinois UP, 2008. [monograph]
Gilyard, Keith and
Adam J. Banks. On African-American
Rhetoric. Routledge, 2018. [monograph]
Gold, David. “Seizing the Methodological Moment: The Digital
Humanities and Historiography in Rhetoric and Composition.” College
English, vol. 76, no. 2, 2013, pp. 105-14. [article]
Gonzalez, Alberto and Hsin-I Cheng. “Intercultural
Rhetoric.” Rhetoric of Western Thought: From the Mediterranean World to the
Global Setting, edited by Ruth Golden, Goodwin Berquist, James M. Sproule
and William E. Coleman. Tenth Edition.
Kendall/Hunt, 2013. [chapter]
Hesford, Wendy,
and Wendy Kozol. “Introduction.” Just Advocacy? Women’s Human Rights,
Transnationalism, and the Politics of Representation, edited by Wendy Hesford and Wendy Kozol. Rutgers
University Press, 2005.
[chapter]
Hoang, Haivan V. Writing Against Racial Injury: The Politics
of Asian American Student Rhetoric. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2015. [monograph]
Hallenbeck, Sarah. Claiming the Bicycle: Women, Rhetoric, and Technology
in Late Nineteenth Century America. Southern Illinois
UP, 2016. [monograph]
Jack, Jordynn. Science
on the Home Front: American Women Scientists in World War II. University of
Illinois Press, 2009. [monograph]
Kennedy, George. Comparative Rhetoric:
An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford UP,
1998. [monograph]
King, Lisa. “Sovereignty, Rhetorical
Sovereignty, and Representation: Keywords for Teaching Indigenous Texts.” Survivance, Sovereignty, and Story: Teaching
American Indian Rhetorics, edited by Lisa King, Rose Gubele, and Joyce Rain
Anderson. Utah State University
Press, 2015. [chapter]
Lipson, Carol S., and Roberta A. Binkley,
eds. Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks. New York: State University
of New York Press, 2004. [edited collection]
Lyons, Richard Scott. X-Marks: Native Signatures of Assent. University of Minnesota
Press, 2010. [monograph]
Mao, Lu Ming. Making Chinese Fortune Cookie: The Making of
Chinese American Rhetoric. Utah State University Press, 2006. [monograph]
Ono, Kent A. “Borders
that Travel: Matters of the Figural Border.” Border Rhetorics: Citizenship and Identity on the US-Mexico Frontier, edited
by Robert D. DeChaine. University of
Alabama Press, 2012. [chapter]
Pough, Gwendolyn. Check
It While I Break It: Black Womanhood, Hip-Hop Culture, and the Public Sphere. Northeastern,
2004. [monograph]
Ratcliffe, Krista.
Rhetorical Listening: Identification, Gender, Whiteness. Southern
Illinois UP, 2005. [monograph]
Royster, Jacqueline Jones and Gesa E. Kirsch. Feminist
Rhetorical Practices: New Horizons for Rhetoric, Composition, and Literacy
Studies. Southern Illinois UP, 2012. [monograph]
Smitherman,
Geneva. Talkin That Talk: Language, Culture, and Education in African
America. Routledge, 2000. [monograph]
Wu, Hui. Once
Iron Girls: Essays on Gender by Post-Mao Chinese Literary Women. Lexington,
2009. [monograph]
Feminist Rhetorics (27)
Bizzell, Patricia. “Opportunities for Feminist Research in the History
of Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 11, no. 3, 1992, pp. 50-58.
[article]
Chávez, Karma, and
Cindy Griffin. “Standing in the Intersections of Feminisms, Intersectionality,
and Communication Studies.” Standing in the Intersection: Feminist Voices,
Feminist Practices in Communication Studies. SUNY Press, 2012. [chapter]
Crenshaw, Kimberlé. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black
Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and
Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, article 8, 1989, pp. 139-67. [article]
Dingo, Rebecca. Networking Arguments: Rhetoric, Transnational
Feminism, and Public Policy Writing. U of Pittsburg P,
2012. [monograph]
Ede, Lisa, Cheryl
Glenn, and Andrea Lunsford. “Border Crossings: Intersections of Rhetoric and
Feminism.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, vol. 13, no. 4, 1995, pp. 401-41. [article]
Foss, Sonja K.,
and Cindy L. Griffin. “Beyond Persuasion: A Proposal for an Invitational
Rhetoric.” Communication Monographs, vol.
62, 1995, pp. 2-18. [article]
Glenn, Cheryl, and
Krista Ratcliffe. Silence and Listening as Rhetorical Arts. Southern
Illinois University Press, 2011. [monograph]
Glenn, Cheryl. Rhetoric
Retold: Regendering the Tradition from Antiquity through the Renaissance. Southern
Illinois University Press, 1997. [monograph]
---. Rhetorical Feminism and This Thing Called
Hope. Southern Illinois University Press, 2018.
Hawhee, Debra. Bodily
Arts: Rhetoric and Athletics in Ancient Greece. 2nd Ed., University
of Texas Press, 2009. [monograph]
---. Rhetoric
in Tooth and Claw: Animals, Language, Sensation. The University of
Chicago Press, Chicago, 2017. [monograph]
---. “Looking Into Aristotle’s Eyes: Toward a
Theory of Rhetorical Vision.” Advances in
the History of Rhetoric, vol. 14, no. 2, 2011, pp. 139–165. [article]
---. “Rhetoric’s Sensorium.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 101,
no. 1, 2015, pp. 2–17. [article]
Hesford, Wendy S. Spectacular Rhetorics: Human Rights,
Transnationalism, and the Politics of Representation. Rutgers
UP, 2005. [monograph]
Graban, Tarez
S. Women's Irony: Rewriting Feminist Rhetorical Histories. Southern
Illinois University Press, 2015. [monograph]
Green, Joyce. “Taking
Account of Indigenous Feminism.” Making Space for Indigenous Feminism, edited by Joyce Green. Zed Books,
2007. [chapter]
Lu, Min-Zhan. “Composing Postcolonial Studies.”
Crossing Borderlands: Composition and Postcolonial Studies, edited by Andrea
A. Lunsford and Lahoucine Ouzgane. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004,
pp. 9-32. [chapter]
Moraga, Cherríe,
and Gloria Anzaldúa, editors. This
Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. Kitchen Table Press, 1983. [edited collection]
Oullette, Jessica.
"Blogging Borders: Transnational Feminist Rhetorics and Global
Voices." Harlot: A Revealing Look at the Arts of Persuasion, vol.
11, 2014. [article]
Queen, Mary. "Transnational Feminist
Rhetorics in a Digital World." College English, vol. 70, no.
5, 2008, pp. 471-489. [article]
Richards, Rebecca. Transnational Feminist Rhetorics and Gendered
Leadership in Global Politics. Lexington Books, 2014. [monograph]
Rhodes, Jacqueline. Radical Feminism, Writing, and Critical Agency: From
Manifesto to Modern. State University of New York Press, 2005. [monograph]
Royster, Jacqueline Jones. Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change among
African American Women. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000. [monograph]
Rawson, K. J. “Queering
Feminist Rhetorical Canonization.” Rhetorica in Motion: Feminist Rhetorical
Methods & Methodologies, edited
by Eileen Schell and K. J. Rawson. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2010.
[chapters]
Spivak, Gayatri
Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?: Speculations on Widow Sacrifice.” Wedge,
no. 7/8, 1985, pp. 120-130. [article]
Tasker, Elizabeth,
and Frances B. Holt-Underwood. “Feminist Rhetorical Methodologies in Historic
Rhetoric and Composition: From the 1970s to the Present.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 21, no. 1, 2008, pp. 54-71. [article]
Wang, Bo.
“Rethinking Feminist Rhetoric and Historiography in a Global Context: A
Cross-Cultural Perspective.” Advances in the History of Rhetoric, vol. 15, no. 1, 2012, pp. 28-52. [article]
List 2: Methods and Methodologies in Rhetoric
and Composition and Literacy Studies (48)
Rationale
In this list, I first
consider the methods and methodologies scholars within rhetoric and composition
have used to conduct research, with a focus on qualitative research and
ethnography. I anticipate using a mixed-methods approach in my dissertation
project, potentially working in contexts material and digital. Next, I narrow
in more specifically on literacy studies as an area within rhetoric and
composition, considering how literacy has been conceived of historically and
how its definition continues to change over time.
Qualitative Research
and Ethnography in Rhetoric and Composition (23)
Canagarajah, Suresh. “Teacher Development in a
Global Profession: An Autoethnography.” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 46,
no. 2, 2012, pp. 258-279. [article]
Canagarajah, Suresh. “The Fortunate Traveler:
Shuttling between Communities and Literacies by Economy Class.” Reflections
on Multiliterate Lives. Editors Diane Belcher and Ulla Connor. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters, 2001, pp. 23-37. [article]
Cushman, Ellen. "Translingual and
Decolonial Approaches to Meaning Making." College English,
vol. 78, no. 3, 2016, pp. 234-242. [article]
Corbin, Juliet and Ansem Strauss. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques
and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. (3rd ed.) Los
Angeles: Sage Publications, 2008. [monograph]
Endres, Danielle, Aaron Hess, Samantha
Senda-Cook, and Michael K. Middleton. “In Situ Rhetoric: Intersections Between
Qualitative Inquiry, Fieldwork, and Rhetoric.” Cultural Studies: Critical
Methodologies, vol. 16, no. 6, Dec. 2016, pp. 511–524, doi:10.1177/1532708616655820.
[article]
Gee, James Paul. How to do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. NY: Routledge, 2011.
[monograph]
Geisler, Cheryl. Analyzing Streams of Language: Twelve Steps to the Systematic Coding of
Text, Talk, and Other Verbal Data. New York: Pearson/Longman, 2004. [monograph]
Hawk, Byron. A Counter-History of
Composition: Toward Methodologies of Complexity. University of
Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 2007. [monograph]
Johnson, Nathan R. “Information Infrastructure as Rhetoric: Tools
for Analysis.” Poroi: An Interdisciplinary
Journal of Rhetorical Analysis & Invention, vol. 8, no. 1, 2012, pp.
1-3.
Johanek, Cindy. Composing Research: A Contextualist Paradigm for Rhetoric and
Composition. Logan: Utah State UP, 2000. [monograph]
Kirsch, Gesa and Patricia A. Sullivan. Methods and Methodology in Composition
Research. Carbondale: Illinois State UP, 1992. [monograph]
MacNealy, Mary Sue. Strategies for Empirical Research in Writing. New York: Allyn and
Bacon, 1999. [monograph]
McKee, Heidi A,
and James E. Porter. “Rhetorica Online: Feminist Research Practices in
Cyberspace.” Schell and Rawson, pp. 152-72. [article]
McKinnon, Sara L., et al. Text + Field:
Innovations in Rhetorical Method. The Pennsylvania State University
Press, University Park, Pennsylvania, 2016. [monograph]
McKinnon, Sara L., et al. “Rhetoric and Ethics
Revisited: What Happens When Rhetorical Scholars Go Into the Field.” Cultural
Studies ↔
Critical Methodologies, vol. 16, no. 6, Dec. 2016, pp. 560–570,
doi:10.1177/1532708616659080. [article]
Middleton, Michael
K., et al. “Contemplating the Participatory Turn in Rhetorical Criticism.”
Cultural Studies ↔
Critical Methodologies, vol. 16, no. 6, Dec. 2016, pp. 571–580, doi:10.1177/1532708616655821. [article]
Morse, Janice M. “The Implications of Interview
Type and Structure in Mixed-Methods Designs.” The Sage Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, edited
by Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney. 2nd edition. SAGE, 2012, pp. 193-204.
[chapter]
Nickoson, Lee and Mary P. Sheridan (Eds.). Writing Studies Research in Practice:
Methods and Methodologies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press,
2012. [monograph]
North, Stephen M. The Making of Knowledge in Composition: Portrait of an Emerging Field.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1987. [monograph]
Pink, Sarah. Doing Sensory
Ethnography. Sage Publications, 2009. [monograph]
Rinehart, Robert E. “Antipodean Performativity:
Contemporary Ethnography Across the Disciplines.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies,
vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2012, pp. 3–7,
doi:10.1177/1532708611430478. [article]
Stake, Robert E. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: Guilford
Press, 2010. [monograph]
Villanueva, Victor, C. Jan Swearingen, and Susan
McDowell. “Research in Rhetoric.” Research
on Composition: Multiple Perspectives of Two Decades of Change, edited by
Peter Smagorinski. New York: Teachers College Press, 2006, pp. 170-188. [chapter]
Literacy Studies (25)
Adler-Kassner, Linda, and Elizabeth Wardle,
editors. Naming What We Know: Threshold
Concepts of Writing Studies. Utah State UP, 2016. [edited collection]
Banks, Adam. “Aint No Walls Behind the Sky,
Baby! Funk, Flight, Freedom.” CCC, vol.
67, no. 2, 2015, pp. 267–279. [address]
Brandt, Deborah. "Awakening to Literacy
Circa 1983." College Composition and Communication, vol. 69,
no. 3, 2018, pp. 503. [article]
---. The Rise of Writing: Redefining
Mass Literacy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom,
2015. [monograph]
Berlin, James A. “Contemporary Composition: The
Major Pedagogical Theories.” College
English, vol. 44, no. 8, 1982, pp. 765–777. [article]
Cushman, Ellen. "Translingual and
Decolonial Approaches to Meaning Making." College English, vol. 78, no. 3, 2016,
pp. 234. [article]
Fleckenstein, Kristie S. “Writing Bodies:
Somatic Mind in Composition Studies.” College
English, vol. 61, no. 3, 1999, pp. 281-306. [article]
Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. “A Cognitive
Process Theory of Writing.” CCC, vol.
32, no. 4, 1981, pp. 365–387. [article]
Goggin, Maureen D., and Peter N. Goggin. Serendipity
in Rhetoric, Writing, and Literacy Research. Utah State University
Press, Logan, 2018. [monograph]
Heath, Shirley Brice. Ways with Words.
Cambridge University Press, 1983. [monograph]
hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom.
Routledge, 1994. [monograph]
Jung, Julie. Revisionary Rhetoric, Feminist Pedagogy, and
Multigenre Texts. Southern Illinois UP, 2005. [monograph]
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. Multimodal Discourse. Bloomsbury
Academic, 2001. [monograph]
Kynard, Carmen. Vernacular
Insurrections: Race, Black Protest, and the New Century in
Composition-Literacies Studies. State University of New York Press,
Albany, 2013. [monograph]
Pratt, Mary L. Arts of the Contact
Zone. National Council of Teachers of English, 2002. [monograph]
Rose, Mike. Why School?: Reclaiming
Education for all of Us. The New Press, New York, New York, 2014.
[monograph]
Royster,
Jacqueline Jones. “When the First Voice You Hear Is Not Your Own.” College
Composition and Communication, vol. 47, no. 1, 1996, pp. 29-40. [address]
Ruiz, Iris. Reclaiming Composition for Chicano/as and Other
Ethnic Minorities: A Critical History and Pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. [monograph]
Sirc, Geoffrey. English Composition As A Happening. Utah State UP, 2002.
[monograph]
Selfe, Cynthia L., and Gail E. Hawisher. Exceeding
the Bounds of the Interview: Feminism, Mediation, Narrative, and Conversations
about Digital Literacy. Southern Illinois UP, 2012. [book]
Selfe, Cynthia L., and Gail E. Hawisher.
"A Historical Look at Electronic Literacy." Journal of
Business and Technical Communication, vol. 16, no. 3, 2002, pp. 231.
[article]
Yancey, Kathleen Blake. “Made Not Only in
Words: Composition in a New Key.” CCC,
vol. 56, no. 2, 2004, pp. 297–328. [address]
Thompson, Becky. Teaching
with Tenderness: Toward an Embodied Practice. University of Illinois Press,
2017. [monograph]
Waite, Stacy. Teaching
Queer: Radical Possibilities for Writing and Knowing. University of
Pittsburgh Press, 2017. [monograph]
Wenger, Etienne. (2000). “Communities of
Practice and Social Learning System.” Organization, 7(2),
225-246.
Area 3: Rhetorics
and Technologies (49)
Rationale
In the
lists above, I consider how the rhetorical tradition has been transformed
through new metaphors for understanding language and symbolic action, new
perspectives on rhetorical practices, and disciplinary theoretical interventions;
then, I move to examine how rhetoric has historically been studied and the
interaction between research methods and teaching praxis. In this area, I focus
on the ways the rhetorical tradition and methods for research and teaching
interact within discourses of technology. Scholars within rhetoric and
composition have turned to multimodal, often digital texts, in order to address
the changing relationships between writers, texts, and composing technologies.
Their work productively intersects with the scholarship in software studies, an
interdisciplinary field that Mark Marino defines as “an approach that
applies critical hermeneutics to the interpretation of computer code, program
architecture, and documentation within a socio-historical context.” Building on
the interplay of these two conversations, I turn towards technical writing as
one central context where rhetoric and technology meet.
Composing
Digital Rhetoric (16)
Anderson,
Dan. Screen Rhetoric and the Material World. University of
Michigan Press, 2014. [monograph]
Banks, Adam. Digital Griots.
Southern Illinois University Press, 2011. [monograph]
Blair, Kristine,
Radhika Gajjala, and Christine Tulley. Webbing Cyberfeminist Practice:
Communities, Pedagogies, and Social Action. Hampton Press, 2009. [monograph]
Berry, Patrick W.,
Gail E. Hawisher, and Cynthia L. Selfe. Transnational Literate Lives in
Digital Times. Utah State University Press, Logan, Utah, 2012. [monograph]
Ferster, Bill. Teaching Machines: Learning from the
Intersection of Education and Technology. Johns Hopkins University Press,
2014. [monograph]
Gauntlett,
David. Making Is Connecting. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011. [monograph]
Galloway,
Alexander R. The Interface Effect.
Polity Press, 2012. [monograph]
Hess, Aaron. “Introduction:
Theorizing Digital Rhetoric.” Theorizing
Digital Rhetoric, edited by Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson. Routledge, 2018. [chapter]
Jenkins, Henry. Convergence
Culture. New York: NYU Press, 2006. [monograph]
Losh, Elizabeth, Jacqueline Wernimont,
Laura Wexler, and Hong-An Wu. “Putting the Human Back into the Digital
Humanities: Feminism, Generosity, and Mess.” Debates in the Digital
Humanities. Gold, Matthew, editor. University of Minnesota Press, 2012
and 2013. [chapter]
Tynes, Brendesha,
Joshua Schuschke, and Safia Umoja Noble. “Digital Intersectionality Theory” and
the #BlackLivesMatter Movement.” The
Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class, and Culture Online. Safiya Umoja
Noble and Brendesha M. Tynes, editors. Peter Lang, 2016. [chapter].
Rieder, David M. Suasive Iterations: Rhetoric, Writing, &
Physical Computing. Parlor Press, 2017. [monograph]
Scott, Kimberly A., and Patricia Garcia.
“Techno-Social Change Agents: Fostering Activist Dispositions Among Girls of
Color.” Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, vol. 15, no. 1,
2016, pp. 65–85. [article]
Wysocki, Anne. “Opening New Media to
Writing: Openings and Justifications.” Writing New Media: Theory and
Applications for Expanding the Teaching of Composition, edited by Anne Wysocki, Johndan Johnson-Eilola,
Cynthia L. Selfe, and Geoffrey Sirc. Utah State University Press, 2004. [chapter]
---. “Seeing the Screen: research into visual
and digital writing practices.” Handbook
of Research on Writing: History, Society, School, Individual, and Text, edited
by Charles Bazerman. Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008. [chapter]
Vee, Annette. Coding Literacy: How Computer Programming is
Changing Writing. MIT Press, 2017. [monograph]
Software
Studies (24)
Abbate, Janet. Recoding Gender: Women’s Changing
Participation in Computing. MIT Press, 2012. [monograph]
Beck, Estee. “A
Theory of Persuasive Computer Algorithms for Rhetorical Code Studies. Enculturation: A Journal of Rhetoric,
Writing, and Culture. 22 November 2016. www.enculturation.net/a-theory-of-persuasive-computer-algorithms.
[article]
Boluk, Stephanie
and Patrick Lemieux. Metagaming. University
of Minnesota Press, 2017. [monograph]
Chun, Wendy Hui
Kyong. Programmed Visions: Software and
Memory. MIT Press, 2011. [monograph]
Cox, Geoff and
Alex McLean. Speaking Coding: Coding as
Aesthetic and Political Expression. MIT Press, 2012. [monograph]
Dyer-Witheford,
Nick and Greig De Peuter. Games of
Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. University of Minnesota Press,
2009. [monograph]
Everett, Anna. Digital Diaspora: A Race for CyberSpace. SUNY
Press, 2009. [monograph]
Evens, Arden. “The Logic of Digital Gaming.” Mechademia,
vol. 6, 2011, pp. 260–269. [article]
Ensmenger, Nathan L. The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics
of Technical Expertise. MIT Press, 2012. [monograph]
Fuller, Matthew and Malina Roger. Software Studies: A Lexicon. MIT Press,
2008. [monograph]
Galloway, Alexander R. Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. University of Minnesota
Press, 2006. [monograph]
Golumbia, David. The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism. University
of Minnesota Press, 2016. [monograph]
Grier, David Alan. When Computers Were Human. Princeton University Press, 2005. [monograph]
Hicks, Marie. Programmed Inequality: How Britain Discarded Women Technologists and
Lost Its Edge in Computing. MIT Press, 2017. [monograph]
Kevorkian, Martin. Color Monitors: The Black Face of Technology in America. Cornell
University Press, 2006. [monograph]
Kittler, Freidrich. “There is No Software.”
Ctheory.net. 18 October 1995. [article]
Manovitch, Lev. Software Takes Command. Bloomsbury Press, 2013. [monograph]
Marino, Mark. “Critical Code Studies.”
electronic book review. 4 December 2006. [article]
Nakamura, Lisa. Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. University of
Minnesota Press, 2008. [monograph]
---. “Indigenous Circuits: Navajo Women and the
Racialization of Early Electronic Manufacture.” American Quarterly, vol. 66, no. 4, 2014. [article]
Schiller, Dan. Digital Depression: Information Technology and Economic Crisis. University
of Illinois Press, 2014. [monograph]
Scholz, Trebor. Uberworked and Underpaid: How Workers Are Disrupting the Digital
Economy. Polity Press, 2017. [monograph]
Srnicek, Nick. Platform Capitalism. Polity Press, 2017. [monograph]
Terranova, Tiziana. Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. Pluto Press,
2004. [monograph]
Teaching
Technological Literacies in Technical Writing (9)
Bernhardt, Stephen A. “The Shape of the Text to
Come: The Texture of Print on Screens.” Central Works in Technical
Communication. Central Works in Technical Communication, edited by
Johndan Johnson-Eilola and Stuart A. Selber, Oxford UP, 2004, pp. 409-427.
[chapter]
Buehl, Jonathan. Assembling Arguments:
Multimodal Rhetoric and Scientific Discourse. Univ. of South Carolina
Press, 2016. [monograph]
Connors, Robert J. “The Rise of Technical
Writing Instruction in America.” Central Works in Technical Communication,
edited by Johndan Johnson-Eilola and Stuart A. Selber, Oxford UP, 2004, pp.
3–19. [chapter]
Johnson, Robert R. “Audience Involved: Toward a
Participatory Model of Writing.” Central Works in Technical Communication,
edited by Johndan Johnson-Eilola and Stuart A. Selber, Oxford UP, 2004,
pp. 91–105. [chapter]
Locke Carter, Joyce. “Making, Disrupting,
Innovating.” College Composition and
Communication, vol.68,
no.2, 2016, pp.378-408. [article]
Pfister, Damien Smith. “The Terms of
Technoliberalism.” Theorizing Digital Rhetoric, Routledge 2018. Edited
by Aaron Hess and Amber Davisson. pp. 32-42.
[chapter]
Selber, Stuart. Multiliteracies for a
Digital Age. Southern Illinois University Press, 2004. [monograph]
Selfe, Richard J. and Cynthia L. “What are the Boundaries,
Artifacts, and Identities of Technical Communication?” Solving Problems in
Technical Communication. University of Chicago Press, edited by Johndon
Johnson-Eilola and Stuart Selber, 2013. [chapter]
Smith, Elizabeth Overman, and Isabelle
Thompson. “Feminist Theory in Technical Communication: Making Knowledge Claims
Visible.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 16, no.
4, 2002, pp. 441–477. [article]
Comments
Post a Comment